The Cost Of Council Cock-Ups

South Cambridgeshire District Council

is to commence proceedings in the High Court after discovering two planning permission errors. The local authority said one mistake had led to planning permission for an extension and annexe in Steeple Morden being issued in error. The permission was granted despite the application still being open for people to comment on.

“This planning decision, issued without the relevant authorisation, was caused by human error when the wrong box was ticked on the planning computer system” it explained. The issuing of the planning permission included the publication of the decision on the planning section of the council’s website on Friday 13 November. South Cambridgeshire said it “immediately notified the applicant and temporarily took down the decision notice while deciding on the way forwards. This incorrect decision notice has now been republished on the council’s website”.

This decision had already been quashed by the High Court once after administrative errors in the way it was initially considered. The council said that to avoid further delay, the applicant had been invited to submit a new planning application for their proposed extension and annexe.


The second case saw a planning permission being issued without the accompanying conditions. It related to the landscaping, layout and other details around eight new homes in Great Abington. The council will ask the High Court to rescind this planning decision so that the decision notice can be re-issued with the agreed conditions attached.

South Cambridgeshire said it had spoken and written to both applicants and their planning agents to apologise.
Lead Cabinet Member for Planning, Cllr Dr. Tumi Hawkins, asked the authority’s legal team to launch the High Court proceedings. The original judicial review in Steeple Morden cost the council approximately £5,000. These two judicial reviews are expected to cost similar amounts.

Investigations by the council’s Internal Audit team, independent of the Planning Service, have meanwhile begun to further examine what happened in each case. The findings and recommendations will be published and presented to councillors at a future public meeting, South Cambridgeshire said.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is helpsouthcambs.png

Council Leader, Cllr Bridget Smith, said “We are very sorry. We’ve spoken to the applicants and their planning agents in both of these cases, and have written to them, to apologise. Our Internal Audit Team is already investigating what has happened. We’ll be reviewing the recommendations from their report as well as looking at how we can change our processes to try and further limit the possibilities for human error. Unfortunately, we have no option but to go to the High Court to rescind these incorrect permissions and this is why the Lead Cabinet Member for Planning has already started this process. We are taking this very seriously and I want to apologise again”.

The £15,000 costs for these council cock-ups will presumably mean less money for other services. Or it might come from their magic “not useable reserves” that we’ve been learning so much about here in West Lancashire?
One error is accidental, three errors are a habit!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s