Corruption, And Suspicion Of It, In Serco

Outsourcing Serco has a long term leisure contract with WLBC. The company declares “Even on the smallest scale, corruption is corrosive, and just the suspicion of it can severely damage our reputation. Remember: we would rather forego business or lose money than become involved in corruption even on the smallest scale. Sometimes doing wrong can seem right. For instance, when a small illegitimate payment would prevent a project falling behind schedule, it may seem harmless to pay up. Never be tempted to do so. Bribery means giving or receiving an unearned reward to influence someone’s behaviour. One common form of bribery is a “kickback” an unearned reward following favourable treatment. Both are corrupt.

“Corruption is any unlawful or improper behaviour that seeks to gain an advantage through illegitimate means. Bribery, abuse of power, extortion, fraud, deception, collusion, cartels, embezzlement and money laundering are all forms of corruption”.

In July 2013 Justice Secretary Chris Grayling

seen with London based WLBC Cllr Currie, told the Commons that G4S, along with rival Serco, could have overcharged the taxpayer by up to £50million for monitoring tagged crooks who were in jail, abroad or even dead.

Serco officially stated “Serco Geografix Ltd has taken responsibility under the terms of the proposed DPA for three offences of fraud and two of false accounting committed between 2010 and 2013 related to the reporting to the UK Ministry of Justice (MoJ) of the levels of profitability of Serco’s Electronic Monitoring (EM) contract. These issues were reported by Serco to the SFO and the MoJ in November 2013.

“Investigations into allegations of wrongful billing which were the subject,  understandably, of significant public and Parliamentary concern in 2013 have now been concluded without any criminal charges against Serco”.

The Independent Newspaper wrote about routine use of council gagging orders leaving Britain open to corruption. “If staff are silenced by gagging orders, it increases the risk that we will wake up in five or ten years to find that corruption has taken root in local government” was referring to council workers having been routinely issued with gagging orders when they left public service.

An investigation found that thousands of ex-council workers were offered extra money under “compromise agreements” if they promised not to say anything bad about their former employers. And figures obtained by BBC Radio 5 live suggested £226.7 million of taxpayers’ money had been paid out as part of settlements to more than 17,500 council workers, most of which included strict secrecy clauses.

Metro News told us “The UK has dropped three places to 11th in the latest report on corruption levels around the world. And make no mistake, despite the UK’s general complacency about not being a corrupt country, there is plenty of it about. A former advisor to the prime minister back in late 2017 wrote about the ‘endemic’ corruption in the UK’s planning system. “In every corner of the country, you can find stories of bribery, with local councillors and officials rigging the planning process for their own gain” he said.

The CIPFA Code of Practice on Managing the Risk of Fraud and Corruption is applicable to all public services organisations. The code is comprised of five key principles, which are to: acknowledge the responsibility of the governing body for countering fraud and corruption; identify the fraud and corruption risks; develop an appropriate counter fraud and corruption strategy; provide resources to implement the strategy; take action in response to fraud and corruption.

And in the Local Government Transparency Code 2015 is stated “Local authorities should use a risk management approach with strong internal control arrangements to reduce the risk of any payment fraud as a result of publishing public data. Local authorities should refer to the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy Code of Practice on Managing the Risk of Fraud and Corruption”.
WLBC, even under its new management, has its own policy on anti-fraud and corruption. As we relate so often Serco Leisure Operating Ltd sub-contracted with Oakland Golf and Leisure Ltd to undertake what was supposedly a development of the Beacon Park Golf Course. Serco even allowed Oakland Golf and Leisure Ltd to make a planning application relating to a golf course condition by its named Director, Jonathan Snellgrove, whose public record at Companies House included company dissolution owing £100,000 of VAT to HMRC, never recovered, and included a Liverpool Magistrates conviction following a case brought by Knowsley Borough Council planning department

WLBC states “Areas which may be most at risk in respect of corruption are (this is not an exhaustive list): Tendering and award of contracts”. CONCLUSION 8.1 The Authority has always prided itself on setting and maintaining high standards and a culture of openness, with core values of fairness and trust. This Policy fully supports this desire to maintain an honest Authority, free from fraud and corruption.

8.2 The Authority has in place a network of systems and procedures to assist it in dealing with fraud and corruption when it occurs. It is determined that these arrangements will keep pace with future developments and techniques to both prevent and detect fraudulent or corrupt activity that may affect its operation 8.3 The Authority will maintain a review of these systems and procedures through continuous Internal Audit work and this Policy will also be reviewed regularly.

Readers might think WLBC and its elected members have enough alleged fraud and/or corruption at the Serco leased Beacon Park Golf Course landfill/royalty development to investigate than to insinuate members of the public fighting for justice accuse them of it? Having an individual director of a company involved in fraud might have instigated some due diligence from at least one employee of WLBC. It seems not!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s