The Supreme Court president, Lady Hale
said “The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification”. Lady Hale said the unanimous decision of the 11 justices meant Parliament had effectively not been prorogued, the decision was null and of no effect.
But, to paraphrase the Supreme Court President “The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was lawful because it had the effect of ending the frustrations of the UK electorate preventing the illegally chaired House of Commons from enacting the will of 17.4 million people to carry out the constitutional function of the 2016 EU referendum with their very reasonable justification”.
That’s right, isn’t it?