Posted by: westlancashirerecord | January 25, 2019

The (Not Rosie) Cooper Plan

According to Labour List, there is real peril for the Labour Party

 in the Brexit process “if we appear keen to stop Brexit. Remember Walsall North, Mansfield, Stoke-on-Trent South and Middlesbrough, seats that have always been Labour or had only on rare occasions voted Tory. They had Leave votes of 65-75%, and all were lost in 2017. The vast majority of Labour seats voted to leave (estimates vary from two thirds to three quarters). If a small percentage of Labour Leave voters desert Labour, as they did in those four constituencies, we will lose rather than gain seats”.

The Cooper plan is the main talk of Westminster.

For those of you who’ve missed the detail, I’ll give a brief explainer…On Tuesday, MPs will vote on Yvette Cooper’s amendment to the government’s Brexit motion (if selected by the Speaker, as is very likely). If passed, that would make parliamentary time for her bill, which would be presented to the Commons and swiftly put to a vote a week later on 5th February. The bill gives the government until the end of February to get its act together, but offers parliament a backstop, if you will, in case a deal hasn’t been approved. MPs would then get a vote on whether to extend Article 50, thus avoiding a ‘no deal’ exit in March.

At the moment, the plan would see Brexit Day delayed from 29th March until 31st December. But it’s thought that the Labour frontbench wants that changed to 30th June/1st July, making it only a three-month extension. Keir Starmer’s appearance at the Fabian conference last week hinted this would be their preference: asked whether the EU elections taking place this year would affect an extension, he said “It’s a pretty open secret that the EU have at least discussed extending until 1st July”. The Shadow Brexit Secretary said much the same and added that there’s “room for discussion” with Cooper on that point.

Even with that revision, will it pass?

Some MPs, including Remainers, aren’t convinced that a mere three-month delay is all that helpful. It’s just putting off the inevitable, kicking the can down the road, which both main party leaders are frequently accused of doing. But the aim is to strengthen the voice of parliamentarians during those months, and with extra time MPs have a better chance of getting their various alternatives through, whether it’s another referendum or a citizens’ assembly.

It isn’t plain sailing for the Cooper plan. Caroline Flint has confirmed she won’t back it, and she could be joined by like-minded Labour backbenchers representing Leave seats. Of course, it won’t be getting the support of Labour Leavers such as Kate Hoey and Graham Stringer . In fact, the two have penned a piece for LabourList that criticises colleagues vying to secure another referendum and/or hand control of the process over to parliament.

Quoting Hilary Benn and Chuka Umunna

as having said Brexit was “for the people, not MPs to decide” and “a majority of one is sufficient”, Hoey and Stringer write “Both Chuka and Hilary have now changed their tune”.

Hoey and Stringer argue that plans such as Cooper’s weaken the UK’s negotiating hand. “The EU has a long history of concluding deals at the eleventh hour. They will not do this if there is no defined end and we throw away our strongest card.” But it’s unlikely this will convince MPs who are desperate to avoid ‘no deal’. All eyes are on Labour’s ‘inbetweeners’ and Remainer Tories.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: