Posted by: westlancashirerecord | October 31, 2018

Having Your Say On The New Local Plan Review

Will you be having your say on the WLBC Local Plan Review? The plan will change West Lancashire unbelievably, perhaps unacceptably, for the foreseeable future. The Council’s Cabinet claims it to be an innovative and ambitious long term strategic plan that will help deliver new development to support the growth of the Borough until 2050.

But should the Council’s Cabinet be the arbiter of how 30 years will change the Borough? It will, if the residents of the Borough don’t let them know via the consultation what THEY feel about some aspects of the Review. This   is an example of what WLBC claims, that  “The protection afforded by Safeguarded Land is not what it used to be, and the pattern of “planning by appeal” that Safeguarded Land has attracted across England in recent years is not a sustainable way to plan. This has been seen in West Lancashire with three appeal inquiries on Safeguarded Land in the past few years. While the Council successfully defended these Inquiries (primarily because the Council could demonstrate a five-year housing land supply), they all have unnecessarily taken up Council resources on defending planning decisions on sites which, in previous years, would not even have generated an application such was the status of Safeguarded Land. For this reason, designating sites as safeguarded land provides no certainty for local residents concerned about when, and how, those sites may be developed. £81,248.35 unnecessarily spent! Yet they spent it!

Cllr John Hodson says “If people are objecting to a proposal, we would always encourage them to also set out how they would change the policy they are objecting to or what site they would suggest the Council should allocate instead of the one they are objecting to, and to give planning reasons for their objections. This will help the Council prepare the best possible Local Plan”.

To read the Local Plan Review Preferred Options document, and for more information on the Local Plan Review, please visit the Council’s website http://www.westlancs.gov.uk/lpr, where you can also give your views to be considered as part of the consultation. Printed copies of key consultation documents will also be available at libraries and the Council Customer Service Points (at the Council’s Derby Street offices in Ormskirk and at the Concourse Shopping Centre in Skelmersdale).

The easiest way to provide your comments will be online, through the consultation webpages, but a standard form can also be downloaded from the website or picked up from the above locations. Remaining dates and venues for the Local Plan consultation events are Wednesday 31 October – Skelmersdale Ecumenical Centre; Monday 5 November – Tarleton Cricket Club; Wednesday 7 November – Ormskirk Chapel Gallery; Tuesday 13 November – The Grove Youth and Community Centre, Station Approach, Burscough; Wednesday 14 November – Skelmersdale Ecumenical Centre; Thursday 15 November – Halsall Memorial Hall.

Communities already feeling disenfranchised by the events at the WLBC September  meeting might benefit from resident drops of the printed copies of the consultation documents around their areas, door to door. Every single submission to WLBC has participation value. Remember whose Borough this is, ours!


Responses

  1. This is all so depressing. To pick one comment out at random from the towering intellect that apparently is Cllr John Hodson. He tells us how important it is for people to not just object to a (green belt) development site – but also, to offer alternative sites for building. This, at a stroke, assumes that the protestors have accepted the insane amount of housing proposed – and are willing to become Merseyside’s overspill.

    This is a well known WLBC tactic; it happened over Yew Tree Farm, where 220 acres have been released for God knows how many houses. Either we in Burscough are going to be at it like rabbits, or Yew Tree Farm is going to become Little Merseyside. 🤔

    • What you write is so true. The list of offers of alternative sites to greenbelt will be short, and developers like the easy option of fields without concern for agriculture. Merseyside, the Liverpool City Region, overspill will almost totally be Sefton overspill. Our first change in title will be “West Lancashire in Greater Sefton”. Perhaps we might receive free off peak rail travel for elderly and disabled West Lancastrians under the Greater Sefton banner?


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: