Posted by: westlancashirerecord | February 16, 2018

“Pendexit” Is Mooted For Pendle Council

“It’s Goodbye From Us, Says Pendle Borough Council” as its borough councillors have threatened to break from Lancashire County Council because the authority “thinks the world doesn’t extend” to their area. Pendle Borough Council  states “We have 49 Councillors as follows: 23 Conservative; 15 Labour; 9 Liberal Democrats; 1 British National Party; 1 Independent. Currently we have a shared executive between Labour and the Liberal Democrats”. It has a population of 90,111. Council tax for Band D is £1,698.07.

Its Corporate Director is the Council’s Returning Officer for elections for which a payment of £2,800 per annum is made. This is included in the post-holder’s salary of £108,117 and indicates double funding for the post and days of election work, as in West Lancashire and other authorities. Senior Officer “Benefits in Kind” are a contribution towards a leased car based on 10% of the post holder’s salary. Elected members receive £3,000 basic, and the Leader receives an additional £4,000 while executive members and some committee chairs receive an additional £1,200.

Conservatives want Pendle Borough Council to become a unitary authority, giving it added education, transport and social care powers. Supporting the plan, Labour’s Mohammed Iqbal said Lancashire County Council think the area “is on another planet”. But County council deputy leader Albert Atkinson said the idea was “rubbish”.

Pendle Borough Council currently organises services such as bins, recycling, parks, tourism and burials. It collects council tax, but only keeps a portion and hands the rest to Lancashire County Council. Recognising the size of the borough, councillors propose that as a unitary authority, they would partner with another Lancashire or North Yorkshire council to provide some services.

Pendle’s deputy Conservative leader Paul White said he was “hopeful the government will allow us to do it. Obviously we would have to present a case to the secretary of state, [but] there is clearly a need for local government reform in Lancashire – we have a fragmented system at the moment.” He added that he was “hopeful the government will see it as a positive step”, particularly if they were able to show they could “make savings without having to cut front-line services”.

Mr Iqbal said the move was “a warning shot across their bows”, because Pendle was “at breaking point” over cuts made by the county council. “Unless there are drastic changes, we will not be the only one lining up to say ‘It’s goodbye from us’,” he added.

Dismissing the idea, LCC Atkinson said it would “cost a fortune as Pendle is just too small”. Quite frankly, I would be very surprised if the government give it much credence” he said. On the other hand, some might say “Pendexit, here we come!”


Responses

  1. Well done Pendle. Can anyone looking at the woeful service we get in West Lancashire from the county council and most of our county councillors argue that trying a different model isn’t worth it, especially as other unitaries have cut some of the costs of being in business. Only one set of councillors to start with.

    • Agreed, well done Pendle. A bit insulting to hear that it shouldn’t be given much credence? A referendum of the population might prove interesting, and why not some testing of the water here in West Lancashire?


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: