WLBC Chief Executive In Line For A Pay Rise Of £2,484

A happier new year for some rather than others is heading for the senior staff at WLBC . Readers may recall that early last month it was disclosed the majority of council employees, the lowest paid, will receive a 2% pay increase in each of the next two years under a proposal being considered by unions.

Not to be outdone by the offer, the union representing council chief executives and senior managers has submitted a pay claim that matches the 2% pay offer made to general council staff. The Association of Local Authority Chief Executives & Senior Managers (Alace) chair Tracey Lee said the increase was necessary due to “increasing pressures” on senior managers caused by austerity and Brexit.

Brexit? Seriously, how in hell can Brexit have put “increasing pressure” on the Chief Executive and Senior managers of WLBC? Ms Lee said “Given this context, Alace does not believe that chief executives should receive less generous treatment than other local government staff”. The National Employers are expected to respond to Alace’s claim, submitted on 21 December, early in February.

Ms Lee said “The pressures facing heads of paid service in leading their organisations through very challenging times continue unabated. Local government is widely accepted to be the most efficient part of the public sector. Leadership of the highest quality and resilience are demanded from chief executives in transforming councils, delivering public service reform and securing economic and housing growth”.

Conservative councillors attempted to block the 2% offer for the majority of council staff last month, warning that the increase would lead to further cuts to services. WLBC terminated the contracts of 5 employees in 2016-17 in different service areas incurring liabilities of £0.247m (£0.354m in 2015-16). Four of these cases related to voluntary redundancy (compared to 4 in 2015-16) and the other related to the end of a fixed term contract.

The current Statement of Accounts shows the WLBC Chief Executive in receipt of a total Salary plus Pension of £124,186, and as the 2% is likely to also increase the pension element it means an increase of almost £2,484. The lowest paid Senior Officer is likely to receive an additional £1,327.

Author: westlancashirerecord

I am a pensioner. I was a strong supporter of the rights of elderly and disabled residents of West Lancashire to receive equal treatment from the old Tory WLBC that unfortunately did not agree, leading to the social exclusion of some immobile disabled residents. My personal suggestion of honouring the County Regiment led to us having probably the proudest day ever in West Lancashire, with the help of Cllr Adrian Owens who wrote "You will be pleased to learn that this evening the motion passed unanimously. Colonel Amlot from the Regiment was accorded a standing ovation and we look forward to a parade and march through Ormskirk next year. Thank you". After the Parade I wrote to Cllr Owens "I was reading through the emails we exchanged after I made the suggestion to honour our County Regiment. As you said today, we got there in the end, and what an end? This celebration of our Regiment was quite simply, as my original mail said, the greatest honour of all. To see all these young people who risk their lives for us was so moving. Little did I know what Council could do and how our residents would react to it all. Well, we should all be so proud of this great day. I know I am".

5 thoughts on “WLBC Chief Executive In Line For A Pay Rise Of £2,484”

  1. The usual feathering of the nest. Salaries are high enough at the top of organisations such as WLBC. What is the view of Cllr Moran on this?

    1. This CE salary seems ridiculously high for a local authority as small as WLBC. As of yesterday WLBC was advertising 6 vacancies, salaries ranging from £49,386 for a property service manager to £18,080 for an income management assistant. Cllr Moran might be wondering, like us, why the CE salary is so high in comparison?

    2. It might have occurred to WLBC salary watchers that in previous years the senior officer remunerations included “benefits in kind” of £4,578 annually. These are not shown in the 2016/2017 accounts. Perhaps they have been incorporated into salaries, but where and by whom might that decision have been made?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s